On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 16:49, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > And finally, have you considered that Red Hat could cease providing public > SRPMS or even public source for RHEL at any time if they feel that their > income stream is threatened by WBEL or other alternatives? Then how are you > going to get updates? Are they going to patch, test, QA, and replicate all > that software themselves? *cof* For most software in RHEL I don't think they could really do that legally (GPL and Lesser GPL software) Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
