On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 11:36, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jan 13, 2004, David Eduardo Gómez Noguera <davidgn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Its not replicated at zero cost. Electricity and the mediums needed to > > replicate it (i.e. hardware, cd's, time, internet access, etc) dont pop > > out off the air > > The costs you mention are on the person who performs the copy or the > one that gets the copy. Nothing to do with the losses a copyright > holder claims to have when such a copy is performed by a third party, > which is the argument used to deny the right to copy. > Of course. Who was talking about losses here? Conveniently left only what I wrote, out of the context of the thread... Im off this swampy discussion now.
