The problem is now resolved after reloading the system with FC1. I'm sorry for not sticking with it and giving the mailing list a contribution, however I had the option at this point of development to just reload. I should have had more patience and waited for your last message on "glibc-devel/glibc-kernheaders" in regard to correctness. The thought actually came to mind once, especially since I compiled a custom kernel.
Joe I've compiled many kernels in the past with a good success rate, however
where do you think I went wrong on this last one? What impact does a custom
Fedora kernel have on /usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm ? Do I need
to symlink these directories to the kernel source directories instead of relying
on glibc-kernheaders? I'm definitely a little green when it comes to glibc relations
to the kernels.
Here's what steps I used before.
Makefile compiler flags:
HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -mcpu=pentium4 -march=pentium4 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame- pointer
CFLAGS=-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -mcpu=pentium4 -march=pentium4 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing
make mrproper make menuconfig make deps make bzImage make modules_install make install and of course set grub.conf to the custom kernel
Dave
At 05:08 AM 1/13/2004, you wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:22:36PM -0500, Dave Hughes wrote: > I'm building this as a dedicated apache server > for ISPMan. As a comparison I also downloaded > the update httpd-2.0.48-1.2.src.rpm and > made no changes. > I used rpmbuild --bb httpd-2.0.48-1.2.src.rpm > The same results happened with this "cgethost" > issue.
I can't reproduce that here. Maybe check your glibc-devel/glibc-kernheaders etc packages are installed properly?
joe
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
