On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:33:47PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote: > > > Also, highmem support in FC1 may be broken. > > That's not good, if it's true. > > I would use 'suboptimal' rather than broken if its the issues I'm > thinking of. Yes, I should have said "sub-optimal under some circumstances." Sorry Dave, no insult intended. The great irony of the 2.4 series is that 2.4.early sucked in large part because Linus didn't take Rik's patches, then he started a revolt by integrating Andrea's VM. And 2.4.late has sucked because until recently, Marcelo hasn't integrated Andrea's patches. I'm not convinced that removing rmap from the FC1 kernel was the right decision. I suppose I'll have to do some patching and testing. :-/ -Bill
