On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 15:38, Don R Maxwell wrote: > Michael Kearey <mutk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Sean Middleditch wrote: > > > > >>Hmm . From dmesg : > > >> Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb > > >>In my grub.conf > > >> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1.2110.nptl ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb > > >> > > >> > > >>And I still boot in plain old text [ Ok ] thing. Any other tips? (Not > > >>that I care *that* much about it) > > > > > > > > > Just to double check, you do have rhgb still installed, yes? Also, are > > > you sure there are no typos in your sysconfig GRAPHICAL=yes line? > > > > rpm -q rhgb > > rhgb-0.11.1-2 > > > > From /etc/sysconfig/init: > > > > # anything else => new style bootup without ANSI colors or positioning > > BOOTUP=color > > # Turn on graphical boot > > GRAPHICAL=yes > > > > > > Still no graphical boot. Quite odd. > > Ditto. Or at least from one machine. I have two machines running test3. One > works with graphical boot, the other does not. The one that does not is an > OLD HP Vectra VL. It has a P2 and 128MB RAM. The one that does work is a > little Compaq Presario with a Celeron and 320MB. Neither has any of the new > fancy graphics cards. The fact that they differ in this relatively minor way > is indeed odd. You currently have to add "rhgb" without quotes to the end of the kernel line in /etc/grub.conf to get the graphical boot to work. This was mentioned on one of the lists a few days ago. Gerry
