Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: > I'd like to offer public accolades to Red Hat for being explicit with > trademark and license issues, and cleanly delineating the parts that are > not open source and freely redistributable. Red Hat is not required to do this, > and historically some other vendors (SCO/Caldera OpenLinux, and others) > have made it a point to entwine the pieces so as to frustrate attempts to > reuse their work. > > Given the pressures and responsibilties on a publicly-traded company, > this is all the more admirable. Deja vu. Already discussed on http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list more info: http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhel_us_3.html http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/linux-info/rhas-isos http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/ http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html -- HTML mails are going to trash automatically
