On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 10:44:09PM -0400, Met @ Uber wrote: > Would you mind sending the new repository paths? I could send you the path I used, but I'm afraid that won't do you any good. I hauled in the .95 ISOs and used them to build my own local repository. http://www.charlescurley.com/yum.html. However, a quick look through the server at Duke suggests that the following should work: http://mirror.dulug.duke.edu/pub/yum-repository/redhat/0.95/$basearch/ (where $basearch had better be i386), a straightforward edit of the out of the box yum.conf. Try that and let us know if you get a reasonable output to "yum check-update". For example, the kernel should be 2.4.22-1.2088.nptl. > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 22:34, Charles Curley wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 05:45:29PM -0400, Met @ Uber wrote: > > > Can I just change where my Yum is setup to get packages from to update > > > from 94 to 95? Or is that just a _really_ bad idea? > > > > I think you can. I tried it on my test machine, which is an ancient PI > > with just about a GB of installed Fedora on it. Your mileage almost > > certanly will vary. > > -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
Attachment:
pgp3aIGhl6raI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
