Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
• From: "Edward C. Bailey" <ed@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:00:54 -0400
• In-reply-to: <005701c39317$f4082050$7f790180@osbi03981> (Benjamin J. Weiss's message of "Wed, 15 Oct 2003 07:29:17 -0500")
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1066187214.3165.56.camel@matrix> <005701c39317$f4082050$7f790180@osbi03981>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Benjamin" == Benjamin J Weiss <benjamin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

...
>> I would like to try this YUM, APT thing is it easy to use.  Can I simply
>> just type up2date?
...

Benjamin> I dunno, that's what I'm trying to learn. :)

For Test 3, up2date is configured to use yum by default.  It should Just
Work[tm]... :-)

                            Ed
-- 
Ed Bailey        Red Hat, Inc.          http://www.redhat.com/

• References:
  • Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
    • From: Benjamin J. Weiss
  • Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
    • From: Alexandre Oliva
  • Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
    • From: Ernest L. Williams Jr.
  • Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
    • From: Benjamin J. Weiss

• Prev by Date: Re: What closed port 6000?
• Next by Date: Re: What closed port 6000?
• Previous by thread: Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
• Next by thread: Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread