Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
From: "Edward C. Bailey" <ed@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:00:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <005701c39317$f4082050$7f790180@osbi03981> (Benjamin J. Weiss's message of "Wed, 15 Oct 2003 07:29:17 -0500")
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1066187214.3165.56.camel@matrix> <005701c39317$f4082050$7f790180@osbi03981>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Benjamin" == Benjamin J Weiss <benjamin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

...
>> I would like to try this YUM, APT thing is it easy to use.  Can I simply
>> just type up2date?
...

Benjamin> I dunno, that's what I'm trying to learn. :)

For Test 3, up2date is configured to use yum by default.  It should Just
Work[tm]... :-)

                            Ed
-- 
Ed Bailey        Red Hat, Inc.          http://www.redhat.com/

References:
- Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
  - From: Benjamin J. Weiss
- Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
  - From: Ernest L. Williams Jr.
- Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
  - From: Benjamin J. Weiss

Prev by Date: Re: What closed port 6000?
Next by Date: Re: What closed port 6000?
Previous by thread: Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
Next by thread: Re: Apt vs. Yum vs. up2date?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]