On one of my machines I could afford to do a fresh install and everything is great under severn test 2 However, one of my home machines has too many goodies and I wanted to try the upgrade path anyway. Well, I patched the endless search for "/lib/libcom_err.so.3" which up2date and evolution depend on. When test 3 is ready I will try to upgrade again. Thanks, Ernest On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 10:19, Gerry Tool wrote: > On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 09:10, Terry Polzin wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 October 2003 10:06, Gerry Tool wrote: > > > On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 08:39, Terry Polzin wrote: > > > > I would have thought that the base channel for rhn would have been > > > > installed by the time the iso's were available. > > > > > > There is no base channel or registration required. On a fresh install, > > > up2date was configured to use the rawhide channel and has a number of > > > updates available. > > > > > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > Wonderful, so I have to a fresh install? What about my freshly upgraded > > maching from severn2? > > > > I don't know the answer to that. Usually, betaN - betaN+1 upgrades are > not supported and are not a valid testing base. Perhaps Bill Nottingham > can comment. > > Gerry Tool > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list -- Ernest L. Williams Jr. <ernesto@xxxxxxxx>
