I didn't apply any patches to the stock fedora kernel: linux-2.4.22-1.2061.nptl I applied the acpi patches to the kernel.org 2.4.22 kernel. I'm attempting to compile the vanilla kernel with the fedora config. On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 11:45, Sean Middleditch wrote: > On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 11:35, W. Chris Shank wrote: > > Still won't compile: > > > > kernel/kernel.o(.text+0xf9f): In function `schedule': > > : undefined reference to `active_load_balance' > > make[1]: *** [kallsyms] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.22-1.2061.nptl' > > make: *** [vmlinux] Error 2 > > > > Me thinks the source tree is out of sync with the kernel delivered. > > Which patches did you install? Perhaps some patch you used didn't work > quite well with those already in the RH kernel. > > > > > On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 11:03, Sean Middleditch wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 10:45, W. Chris Shank wrote: > > > > I tried to compile a custom 2.4.22 kernel - when I boot it I get a VFS > > > > kernel panic error saying it cannot open root device LABEL=/ or 00:00. > > > > I'm looking through xconfig to see if I don't have devfs setup. I used > > > > the .config included with fedora core kernel source. It doesn't surprise > > > > me that the .config isn't accurate - I couldn't get the fedora core > > > > source to compile acpi, so i think it's not an accurate source tree. > > > > > > You probably want to use the config files found in /boot that you get > > > from installing a kernel image. > > > > > > > > > > > Any pointers the devfs issue is appreciated. > > > > > > > > thanks -- W. Chris Shank ACE Technology Group, LLC chris.shank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.acetechgroup.com
