By "dead-end", I mean a product from which you cannot upgrade to the next release or it's equivalent. For instance with RHL 9, I can upgrade to Fedora Core 1 or RHEL WS/ES/AS. I've told been by different sources that upgrading would not be possible with RHPW. Which, in my opinion, doesn't make make sense because it is still RPM based. Can one upgrade from RHPW to RHEL? Now granted if it is based on the same code set nothing should take place correct? Marcus O. On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 03:12, Chris Kloiber wrote: > On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 16:14, Marcus O. White wrote: > > So, is a dead-end product? If so, why sell it in the first place? I > > realize that RedHat is pushing the Enterprise line... Heck, I've pushing > > it on the job. But, could I, in good faith, or should I recommend RHPWS > > to anyone looking for a "boxed set" version of RedHat Linux? If not, > > then why is it on the sore shelves? > > > > Marcus O. > > This should be discussed on taroon-list@xxxxxxxxxx (I am subscribed > there as well), but I can't say I understand what you mean by "dead-end" > in this case.
