Re: Re: Fedora reliability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 13:57, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:55:42AM -0500, Chris A Czerwinski wrote:
> > >
> > > Should there not be  
> > >     a STABLE version area - for adopters and
> > >                          for those who like to start or fall back onto;
> > 
> > Red Hat Entreprise Linux (WS, ES and AS flavours)
> > 
> very funny Emmanuel - 
> If I want Enterprise then I would choose to do so with Red Hat,
> however it's plain Linux that I would like to stay with.
> What you infer is that Enterprise seems more network security 
> oriented - is that what you mean? and FC Linux isn't?

Can't comment on what Emmanuel is saying. Unless he's working for Red Hat and trying to push Enterprise and WS, I don't know if what he says has validity. Fedora seems really good to me. As good as, if not better than 9 and 8.0 both. If Red Hat is going to indeed push instability into Fedora on purpose and then push Enterprise in the mailing lists, perhaps I need to go distro shopping again?


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux