> On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 13:57, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:55:42AM -0500, Chris A Czerwinski wrote: > > > > > > Should there not be > > > a STABLE version area - for adopters and > > > for those who like to start or fall back onto; > > > > Red Hat Entreprise Linux (WS, ES and AS flavours) > > > very funny Emmanuel - > If I want Enterprise then I would choose to do so with Red Hat, > however it's plain Linux that I would like to stay with. > > What you infer is that Enterprise seems more network security > oriented - is that what you mean? and FC Linux isn't? Can't comment on what Emmanuel is saying. Unless he's working for Red Hat and trying to push Enterprise and WS, I don't know if what he says has validity. Fedora seems really good to me. As good as, if not better than 9 and 8.0 both. If Red Hat is going to indeed push instability into Fedora on purpose and then push Enterprise in the mailing lists, perhaps I need to go distro shopping again? Preston
