Re: Fedora reliability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Chris A Czerwinski wrote:

> On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 11:17, Ryan Daly wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 11:12, Genti A. Hila wrote:
> > > Hi list,
> > >
> > > How relaible do you think is Fedora to use in a real environment  with
> > > Bind and Sendmail packages ?????
> >
> > Right now, probably pretty good.  I'm not sure I'd say that down the
> > road, though.  There may be fast developing packages that make certain
> > things unstable for a production environment if that's what your after.
> > Although, the goal is to keep a "working" distribution, so who knows.
> > With proper testing, I'm sure things will stay rather good.
> > --
> >
> Should there not be
>     a STABLE version area - for adopters and
>                          for those who like to start or fall back onto;
> and a BETA/TEST version area - for the developers or learners
>
> I'm not familiar with this LIST as I have moved from RedHat Instal List
> and thinking of upgrading from RH9 to FC - and I want something STABLE
> being an ex-windows OS- XP Prof. and hearing the call of LINUX.
> I don't consider myself bleeding edge type of guy and I dare say there
> are many who have come over to this List/Site because Red Hat is
> dropping regular flavor Linux and moving toward Enterprise.

Any release will always be stable, IIRC, and if you use yum, you can
determine which repositories to use - stable, testing, and unstable are
available.

-- 

Sam Barnett-Cormack
Software Developer                           |  Student of Physics & Maths
UK Mirror Service (http://www.mirror.ac.uk)  |  Lancaster University




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux