Re: How about slowing down the Fedora release cycle to allow for more QA???

• To: fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: How about slowing down the Fedora release cycle to allow for more QA???
• From: Ryan Daly <daly@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:01:29 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Organization: CTCnet ISP
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 11:44, Preston Crawford wrote:
> More to the point, can't you "track" different repositories?
> 
> Like, I only track stable in yum.conf, so I'm not getting that many
> updates.

Sorry for my ignorance here, but does someone have a quick explanation
of what YUM is and where its involved in the up2date process?
--

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: How about slowing down the Fedora release cycle to allow for more QA???
    • From: Mike Chambers
  • Re: How about slowing down the Fedora release cycle to allow for more QA???
    • From: Michael
  • Re: How about slowing down the Fedora release cycle to allow for more QA???
    • From: Michael Kearey

• References:
  • Re: How about slowing down the Fedora release cycle to allow for more QA???
    • From: Kevin Worthington
  • Re: How about slowing down the Fedora release cycle to allow for more QA???
    • From: Preston Crawford

• Prev by Date: Installing Xine/Mplayer?
• Next by Date: Re: zk rootkit
• Previous by thread: Re: How about slowing down the Fedora release cycle to allow for more QA???
• Next by thread: Re: How about slowing down the Fedora release cycle to allow for more QA???
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread