Re: Freshrpms.net concerns.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov  9, 2003, Maynard Kuona <knxmay001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am sure they will try to maintain compatibility with Fedora core and
> Fedora extras.

IMHO they should think of Fedora Alternatives as well.  Extras
repositories should never replace Fedora Core components.
Alternatives are the ones that should.  Sure, keeping extras in one
repository and alternatives in another, while avoiding the extras from
depending on alternatives, may get tricky, but I'd rather not use a
repo that will force me (or at least get the RHN applet to keep
telling me) to replace a package from the Core with something else.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux