Chuck Wolber wrote: > Like the previous poster said, now that RedHat has made its move, small > businesses (like mine) and *.edu are taking it up the ass. That's pretty > much life and I'm willing to accept that without complaint. RedHat needs > to be reminded though that it's in poor taste to throw it back in our > faces telling us to "pay up or shut up". Why is there so much noise about this *now* ? http://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-watch-list/2002-December/msg00008.html I believe people had more than one year to do something about this. Fedora is free($$$$, sources and binaries), if you need longer lifetime is because you are going to *win money* with it. And Red Hat wants his part, this is capitalism. If you hate it, sorry URSS was going down :-) Red Hat sells products/services. If you like it, pay for it. If you hate it, change you to another distribution. Other thing is on *.edu, *.org and nonprofit organizations *without lucrative aims/projects* I believe Red Hat _should relax_ RHEL license or doing lower prices. Something like Free Solaris Binary License Program http://wwws.sun.com/software/solaris/binaries/bcl.html http://wwws.sun.com/software/solaris/binaries/ -- HTML mails are going to trash automagically
