Re: GPG with up2date is driving me nuts

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: GPG with up2date is driving me nuts
• From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:13:05 -0500 (EST)
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 [CVS]

Alik Widge  said:
> For the record, I've got the same thing driving me nuts, and I do have the
> fedora-release-1 RPM installed. Most of my packages are installing OK, but
> a few (mozilla, f'rinstance) still are reported with bad signatures by
> up2date.


GPG errors could also indicate truncated downloads.  Your example of
Mozilla is a large package.  Try using a mirror.

-- 
William Hooper

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: GPG with up2date is driving me nuts
    • From: Benjamin J. Weiss
  • Re: GPG with up2date is driving me nuts
    • From: Alik Widge
  • SATA controller cards
    • From: Randy Vice

• References:
  • GPG with up2date is driving me nuts
    • From: sean darcy
  • Re: GPG with up2date is driving me nuts
    • From: Sean Estabrooks
  • Re: GPG with up2date is driving me nuts
    • From: Alik Widge

• Prev by Date: ps/2 mouse problems
• Next by Date: Re: GPG with up2date is driving me nuts
• Previous by thread: Re: GPG with up2date is driving me nuts
• Next by thread: SATA controller cards
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread