Re: GPG with up2date is driving me nuts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For the record, I've got the same thing driving me nuts, and I do have the
fedora-release-1 RPM installed. Most of my packages are installing OK, but
a few (mozilla, f'rinstance) still are reported with bad signatures by
up2date.

On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Sean Estabrooks wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:29:48 -0500
> "sean darcy" <seandarcy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > yum fedora-core-1 http://fedora.redhat.com/releases/fedora-core-1
> > yum updates-released
> > http://fedora.redhat.com/updates/released/fedora-core-1
> >
> > rpm -qa gpg-pubkey*
> >
> > shows:
> >
> > gpg-pubkey-30c9ecf8-3f9da3f7
> >
> > which is the id from the web site.
> >
> > I've done:
> >
> > rpm --import  /usr/share/doc/fedora-release-1/RPM-GPG-KEY*
> > and
> > rpm --import  /usr/share/rhn/RPM-GPG-KEY*
> >
> > What do I do now?
> >
>
> Sean,
>
> Any chance these machines were upgraded from versions prior to FC1 ?   Do
> you have fedora-release-1-3.i386.rpm installed or do you still have a
> redhat-release rpm installed?   My guess is the latter.   If so, upgrade
> to the fedora-release rpm and rerun the commands you mention above.
>
> Good luck,
> Sean
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux