In that case there'd be no need for a sendmail-cf package either. Personally, I'd prefer a sendmail rpm which installs the lot, but.... Cheers, Phil --------------------------------------------- Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Don > Sent: 19 December 2003 17:17 > To: fedora-list > Subject: RE: Sendmail not rewriting the domain of the sender. > -Success- > > > On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 08:40, Randal, Phil wrote: > > The average workstation user shouldn't need to install > sendmail-cf - the > > defaults are just fine. However, if you need to change sendmail's > > configuration, sendmail-cf is needed. > > > > It's arguably safer without it installed by default, which > is why I guess it > > isn't. > > I suppose that's a reasonable argument for omitting it. > > FWIW, when I install Linux I select "custom > install"/everything... then > use what I need... as I learn more and more about the details of Linux > the software is there for me to use. Also, it avoids problems like the > original poster had. :-) > > Also, my view is that avoids the problem of differing > opinions regarding > what gets installed... you're suggesting the Fedora packager > people made > a conscience decision to exclude sendmail-cf for a standard > workstation > install... whereas my opinion would be that if sendmail is being > installed, then ALL sendmail components should be installed. > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
