Re: rpm --nodeps vs. yum/apt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: rpm --nodeps vs. yum/apt
From: "Leonard den Ottolander" <leonardjo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:27:36 +0100
In-reply-to: <1071763742.2925.8.camel@digdug>
Priority: normal
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

Hello Cliff,

> When we're ready to begin QA, I
> grab all of the latest appropriate RPMs for our environment via up2date on
> RHN and store them in a central repository.

 If all updates are available in one directory (please move the kernel rpms 
elsewhere) you do not need the --nodeps option. An "rpm -Fv *.rpm" 
suffices. Again, move out the kernel rpms if you do not want to overwrite 
your existing kernel before proceeding.

Bye,
Leonard.

--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rpm --nodeps vs. yum/apt
  - From: William Hooper

References:
- Re: rpm --nodeps vs. yum/apt
  - From: Tom Diehl
- Re: rpm --nodeps vs. yum/apt
  - From: Clif Smith

Prev by Date: Re: cdrom/floppy umount issue possible bug
Next by Date: Re: 2.6 final available, any takers?
Previous by thread: Re: rpm --nodeps vs. yum/apt
Next by thread: Re: rpm --nodeps vs. yum/apt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]