And qmail is also proprietary... not Free Software, while Postfix, Exim, Sendmail and others all are, and as such are compatible with Fedora's objectives (which, I dare to add, silently dropped focusing on user's freedom). Rui On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 17:57, Fulvio wrote: > qmail is fantastic. Postfix is simple to configure > > > Fulvio wrote: > > > > >why sendmail and not postfix? > > > > > > > > >-- > > >fedora-list mailing list > > >fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > >To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > qmail works very well on Fedora. My Fedora/qmail mail server has been > > running for a few weeks now and performs well. > > > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
