The cursor tracking problem first reported against newt well over a year ago, and recently re-opened as the community of blind users tracked down the problem and created the resolution patch, continues unresolved as shown by Bugzilla just a few moments ago. May I point out that this fix is extremely important to thousands of users of Speakup worldwide? So, is there a problem with the fix submitted? It would be most helpful to have newt working properly in Cambridge. John Hearns writes: > From: John Hearns <John.Hearns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Michael K. Johnson wrote: > > >So among our goals, we want to preserve (and increase) usability in > > > >the GUI, want to continue to make intelligent choices about default > >settings for configuration files, want to continue to think about > >data integrity when we choose what to enable and recommend in terms > >of kernel features, etc. > > > > > > > >>I hate to seem like a freeloader (and I've purchased more than a few > >>boxed sets for myself) but the consumer releases, downloaded or > >>purchased, are just more suitable for my users than any of the > >>enterprise offerings and I'm sure I'm not alone. i.e.what happens here > >>is really important. > >> > >> > Also in the area of clustering (Beowulfery and batch farms) the Redhat > 'consumer releases' are widely used. > > I'd maybe like to explore this topic more fully on another thread. > > > > -- > Rhl-list mailing list > Rhl-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-list -- Janina Sajka, Director Technology Research and Development Governmental Relations Group American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) Email: janina@xxxxxxx Phone: (202) 408-8175
