Mark Lord wrote: > Why does link(2) not support hard-linking across bind mount points > of the same underlying filesystem ? do we need link(2) at all? bind mounts are supposed to be (hard/soft) link minus the headaches. -- Democracy is about two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for dinner.
begin:vcard fn:Rogelio M. Serrano Jr n:M. Serrano Jr;Rogelio org:SMSG Communications Philippines;Technical Department adr:;;;;;;Republic of the Philippines email;internet:[email protected] title:Programmer tel;work:+6327534145 tel;home:+6329527026 tel;cell:+639209202267 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- RFC: permit link(2) to work across --bind mounts ?
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- RFC: permit link(2) to work across --bind mounts ?
- Prev by Date: Re: More verizon problems
- Next by Date: [PATCH] Exporting capability code/name pairs
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: permit link(2) to work across --bind mounts ?
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: permit link(2) to work across --bind mounts ?
- Index(es):
 |