Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> Actually thanks for pointing that out Pekka.... Here is a patch that takes
> the regression almost completely away (Too much jetlag combined with flu
> seems to have impaired my thinking I should have seen this earlier). I
> still need to run my slab performance tests on this. But hackbench
> improves.
>
>
> SLUB: Improve hackbench speed
>
> Increase the mininum number of partial slabs to keep around and put
> partial slabs to the end of the partial queue so that they can add
> more objects.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
>

FYI, I'm currently on holiday till Jan 2cd, and I also lost access to the
machine I did the orignal benchmarks on.  But I'll try to reserve it again
after the New Year, and I will run the benchmarks including this patch and
report my findings.

Thanks,

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux