* Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmmmm... Some tests here on an 8p 8G machine:
> In an extreme case (boot with slub_min_order=9 to get huge page sized
> slabs) SLUB can win against SLAB:
>
> N=10 Time: 0.338 Minimally faster
> N=20 Time: 0.560 10% faster
> N=50 Time: 1.353 15% faster
what's up with this regression? There's been absolutely no activity
about it in the last 8 days: upstream still regresses, -mm still
regresses and there are no patches posted for testing.
being able to utilize order-0 pages was supposed to be one of the big
plusses of SLUB, so booting with _2MB_ sized slabs cannot be seriously
the "fix", right?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
