Re: [Jan Beulich] [PATCH] constify tables in kernel/sysctl_check.c

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:14:05PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

 > Remains the question whether it is intended that many, perhaps even
 > large, tables are compiled in without ever having a chance to get used,
 > i.e. whether there shouldn't #ifdef CONFIG_xxx get added.

 > -static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_param_table[] = {
 > +static const struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {

we lost the _param, which will cause a duplicate definition with ..
 
 > -static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
 > +static const struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {

cut-n-paste thinko ?

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/