Re: [PATCH] misc: Removal of final callers using fastcall

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:38:26 -0800 Harvey Harrison <[email protected]> wrote:

> Andrew, I'm not sure who is best to hit with these final dribs and
> drabs removing fastcall.  Once all of these have hit Linus' tree
> I will send a final patch deleting the include/linux/linkage.h
> definitions as well as any remaining occurances.

Yes, that's a good approach, thanks.  Wait until the tree is fastcall-clean
and then kill the definition(s).

I think I skipped rather a lot of remove-fastcall patches because a)
suitable maintainers were cc'ed and b) I was going through a
suicidal-over-bug-reports phase.

Please keep them coming - I've always disliked fastcall.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] misc: Removal of final callers using fastcall
    • From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] misc: Removal of final callers using fastcall
    • From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/2] DMA buffer alignment annotations
• Next by Date: Re: [Jan Beulich] [PATCH] constify tables in kernel/sysctl_check.c
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] misc: Removal of final callers using fastcall
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] misc: Removal of final callers using fastcall
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]