Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530
Balbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was
> felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away.
> We can add this flexibility at a later point when required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
I agree with this direction.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sg_ring for scsi
Previous by thread: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]