Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

* David Miller <[email protected]>, [2007-12-20  0:40 -0800]:
>  The problem is that I created indirection that was totally unused, the
>  operation vectors members for these cases thus didn't get filled in,
>  and we OOPS trying to call NULL pointers as functions :-)
>  
>  This should fix the crash:

It does, tested on a Sun Blade 2000.

Thank you David.
ciao,
    ema
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
  • Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>
  • Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
  • Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: /dev/urandom uses uninit bytes, leaks user data
• Next by Date: Re: After many hours all outbound connections get stuck in SYN_SENT
• Previous by thread: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
• Next by thread: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]