* David Miller <[email protected]>, [2007-12-20 0:40 -0800]: > The problem is that I created indirection that was totally unused, the > operation vectors members for these cases thus didn't get filled in, > and we OOPS trying to call NULL pointers as functions :-) > > This should fix the crash: It does, tested on a Sun Blade 2000. Thank you David. ciao, ema -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
- References:
- Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
- Prev by Date: Re: /dev/urandom uses uninit bytes, leaks user data
- Next by Date: Re: After many hours all outbound connections get stuck in SYN_SENT
- Previous by thread: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
- Next by thread: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
- Index(es):
 |