Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:38:27 +0100

> Also note:
>   - The very same code did not oops at this point in 2.6.22.  It only
>     started doing so in 2.6.23.

2.6.23 is when the sparc64 IOMMU code started relying upon
the dev_archdata bits being correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
  • Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>
  • Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] procfs : Move some extern declaration from fs/proc/proc_misc.c to include/linux/seq_file.h
• Next by Date: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
• Previous by thread: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
• Next by thread: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]