Re: [PATCH] Handle i_size > s_maxbytes correctly

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 06:51:04PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hi Andrew,
> 
>   nobody seemed to care about this patch, so could you pull it into -mm so
> that it gets broader testing? Thanks.

Oh, this can get my ack btw:

Acked-by: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]>
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Principal Software Developer, Oracle
[email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Handle i_size > s_maxbytes correctly
  - From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Handle i_size > s_maxbytes correctly
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Handle i_size > s_maxbytes correctly
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]