Karsten Wiese wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2007 schrieb Robert Hancock:
That seems fishy. What is your value of HZ and what is the timeout value
that was passed in the bad case?
HZ set to 250, timeout to 4ms.
Time spent in poll() taken by clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &time)
before and after poll()call: i.e 62us.
Time measured with hpet gave 166us once.
msecs_to_jiffies (kernel/time.c) has this:
#if HZ <= MSEC_PER_SEC && !(MSEC_PER_SEC % HZ)
/*
* HZ is equal to or smaller than 1000, and 1000 is a nice
* round multiple of HZ, divide with the factor between them,
* but round upwards:
*/
return (m + (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) - 1) / (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
With HZ=250 and m=4 this gives 7/4 or only 1 jiffy, which is not more
than 4ms, but if we are already at near the end of the current jiffy it
could be much less than that (potentially almost no time at all).
Maybe we could convert poll to use a hrtimer for this instead?
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [email protected]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
