Re: [RFC/PATCH] 2.6.24-rcx: Make sys_poll() wait at least timeout ms

Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2007 schrieb Robert Hancock:
> 
> That seems fishy. What is your value of HZ and what is the timeout value 
> that was passed in the bad case?

HZ set to 250, timeout to 4ms.
Time spent in poll() taken by clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &time)
before and after poll()call: i.e 62us.
Time measured with hpet gave 166us once.

      Karsten

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH] 2.6.24-rcx: Make sys_poll() wait at least timeout ms
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH] 2.6.24-rcx: Make sys_poll() wait at least timeout ms
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] sch_generic.c: Make dev_watchdog use deferrable timer
• Next by Date: [PATCH] IGET: Handle errors in ISOFS correctly
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] 2.6.24-rcx: Make sys_poll() wait at least timeout ms
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] 2.6.24-rcx: Make sys_poll() wait at least timeout ms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]