Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:38:27 +0100

>   - There has been no other report of this kind for any other
>     architecture yet.  I would expect e.g. the PPC64 folks to report
>     bugs in our dma mappings eventually.

Irrelevant fact, powerpc handles it's dev_archdata differently
from sparc64.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
  • Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>
  • Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
• Next by Date: Re: PCI resource problems caused by improper address rounding
• Previous by thread: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
• Next by thread: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]