Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[Ingo Molnar - Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 05:01:27PM +0100]
| 
| * Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]> wrote:
| 
| > Checkpatch still does complain about
| > 	if (0) { T__ tmp__; tmp__ = (val)
| > I'm not sure if we need this line at all.
| 
| that's a type-checking trick. It does not result in any generated code 
| but gcc flags it with a build time warning if there's a type mismatch. 
| So it's a checkpatch.pl false positive.
| 
| 	Ingo
| 

Thanks Ingo!

I'll fetch up the tree you mentoined in prev letter and next time
try to be more carefull with patches I'm sending (i'm a bit busy
with my second machine on which i'm trying to install fc8 but
anaconda hangs again and again so that is the reason I'm not sync'ed
with x86 and mm trees yet, sorry)

		Cyrill

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux