Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned

* Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]> wrote:

> Checkpatch still does complain about
> 	if (0) { T__ tmp__; tmp__ = (val)
> I'm not sure if we need this line at all.

that's a type-checking trick. It does not result in any generated code 
but gcc flags it with a build time warning if there's a type mismatch. 
So it's a checkpatch.pl false positive.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned
    • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned
    • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/6] udf: remove wrong prototype of udf_readdir
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]