On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 00:16 -0800, Ray Lee wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 11:09 PM, Ray Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C <[email protected]> wrote: > > Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either > > it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5, or something odd > > when I did a make oldconfig, I suppose. (Or because I'm on an x86-64 > > kernel?) Regardless, -rc5 is currently building, and I'll try it in > > the morning. > > -rc5 works great. Really don't know what's different between my -rc3 > and -rc5 builds. I have an -rc3+wireless bits which also works great wrt. tcpdump/wireshark. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3
- From: Gabriel C <[email protected]>
- Re: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3
- Prev by Date: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week
- Next by Date: ATA bus error with external hd on esata
- Previous by thread: Re: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3
- Next by thread: aead_geniv_* [crypto/seqiv.ko] undefined! (MMOTM stamp-2007-12-13-15-37)
- Index(es):
 |