Re: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3

["Ray Lee" <ray@madrabbit.org>]

On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> >> tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
> >> fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
> >> (-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know.
> >> I'll check current tip on the weekend when I'll have the luxury to
> >> have my main system down long enough for a test. Right now I'm kinda
> >> up against a deadline, but didn't want to leave it unreported. Should
> >> be easy for someone else to confirm or deny whether current tip has
> >> the problem.
> >
> > FYI, I have created a bugzilla entry for this issue at:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9568
>
> Hmm what do you mean by empty ? it does not capturing anything on that interface ?

Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5, or something odd
when I did a make oldconfig, I suppose. (Or because I'm on an x86-64
kernel?) Regardless, -rc5 is currently building, and I'll try it in
the morning.

> I do run -rc5-git with wireshark-0.99.6 and tshark -i eth0 or lo works here.

Excellent. Thank you for checking!

Rafael: I'll update the bugzilla as warranted after testing.

Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/