Re: Possible issue with dangling PCI BARs

On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:20:20PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I may have not fully undestood you in my previous reply. You are proposing
> replacing pci_enable_device_bars() with a pair of pci_enable_device_io/mem ?
> 
> I think that would be a good idea indeed.

I'm all for it. Never liked pci_enable_device_bars :-)

Ivan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Possible issue with dangling PCI BARs
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible issue with dangling PCI BARs
    • From: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible issue with dangling PCI BARs
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible issue with dangling PCI BARs
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible issue with dangling PCI BARs
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: What was the problem with quicklists and x86-64?
• Next by Date: Re: What was the problem with quicklists and x86-64?
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible issue with dangling PCI BARs
• Next by thread: Re: Possible issue with dangling PCI BARs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]