Re: Possible issue with dangling PCI BARs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Supporting pci_enable_device_io / pci_enable_device_mmio / pci_iomap_io /
> > pci_iomap_mmio seems to cover pretty much all the use cases we have. 
> > 
> > The users we have right now that are:
> > 
> >         - pata_cs5520   (can be dealt with easily)
> >         - old IDE       (with the new resource handling for legacy IDE
> > can use pci_enable_device_io I think, ditto pci/cs5520)
> >         - scx200_acb    (looks like a simple substitution works)
> >         - lpfc          pci_enable_device_mmio
> >         - qla2xxx       pci_enable_device ? (enables IO and MMIO)

I may have not fully undestood you in my previous reply. You are proposing
replacing pci_enable_device_bars() with a pair of pci_enable_device_io/mem ?

I think that would be a good idea indeed.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux