From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:35:07 -0800
> How about allowing a return value of -1 from napi_poll and letting
> device check itself.
It doesn't avoid the code duplication in the ->poll() fast paths.
I don't care, on the other hand, if crap accumulates in non-critical
slow paths like napi_disable() and dev_close(). That's why I'm
suggesting solutions in that area.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
