Re: [RFC] net: napi fix

From: Andrew Gallatin <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:02:25 -0500

> Or perhaps we should just leave things as is.

We should probably add a "disabling" state bit to the
napi struct flags, this will be set by napi_disable()
before it loops trying to set the sched bit.

net_rx_action() can then check this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] net: napi fix
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [RFC] net: napi fix
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] net: napi fix
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] net: napi fix
    • From: Andrew Gallatin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Expose _SUN in /proc/acpi/processor/<...>/info
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] net: napi fix
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] net: napi fix
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] net: napi fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]