* Dhaval Giani <[email protected]> wrote: > Could you please see if the following patch removes the oops due to > CFS sysfs files? (There might still be the other oops due to the > floppy sysfs files) > > Ingo, could you please add this patch in your CFS backport to 2.6.22 > and older kernels? sure - i've updated the backport patches with this fix. > static void user_attr_init(struct subsys_attribute *sa, char *name, int mode) > { > + sa->attr.owner = NULL; > sa->attr.name = name; i'm wondering why doesnt this affect 2.6.23 and later? Does sysfs initialize the owner field to NULL automatically? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- References:
- RE: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
- RE: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
- RE: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
- RE: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
- RE: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- Prev by Date: RE: x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] dpt_i2o: don't set DMA_64BIT_MASK [was: Re: [stable] broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2 check page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)]
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- Index(es):
 |