> -----Message d'origine----- > De : [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Dhaval Giani > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:04:00AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:24:37PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 09:15:01AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:03:17 -0500 Fortier,Vincent wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ingo, can you look at this, please? > > > > > Vincent is getting oopses on 2.6.22.14-cfs-etch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > We are looking into this bug now. I believe that the patch at > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119404922603293 should help. > > > > > > > > I am working with Kay to get this ported. > > > > > > > > > > Hi Vincent, > > > > > > Does the following patch help? > > > > > > Kay/Greg, could you please review and add your Signed-off-by(s) as > > > required? > > > > Um, why? What is this patch for? Where is it to be sent, to Linus > > for 2.6.24-final? Or to the -stable tree? > > > > Hi Greg, > > This is for 2.26.24-final, since Fair User scheduling is not > yet there in stable. > > > > This is basically a port of the patch at > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119404922603293 > > > > Yeah, but that patch needs some other core kobject changes, right? > > > > Yep, there are some other changes that patch needed. We have > worked around them by using the existing functions in the > current Linus tree. > > > What exactly are you trying to fix here, the fact that this code never > > even worked? > > > > The code was not using the kobject API. Its been cleaned up now (I > hope!) It refused to apply cleanly on a 2.6.22.14 + CFS v24, only one failure occured. So I resolved it manually and attached the resulting diff. My tests with Galaxy 5.9 shows that it still does not work. Although, the error seems to have changed a bit (see attached dmesg) > > And, please, we need some documentation for Documenatation/ABI/ on > > exactly what these sysfs files and tree is for. Please add that now > > for Linus's tree. > > On to it, will send the patch asap. > > > confused, > > hope i helped (in clearing it :) ) Should this patch eventually be included in? 2.6.25 ? 2.6.24 ? (-stable 2.6.23 & 2.6.22) || backport CFS v24 -> v25 ? Thnx, - vin
Attachment:
dmesg.2.6.22.14-CFSv24-FairUserInterfaceBUGfix
Description: dmesg.2.6.22.14-CFSv24-FairUserInterfaceBUGfix
Attachment:
FairUserInterface-BugFix.patch
Description: FairUserInterface-BugFix.patch
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- References:
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- RE: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <[email protected]>
- RE: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- From: Dhaval Giani <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1: acpi reboots machine... solved
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
- Index(es):