Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[Sorry for the late response as I've been on vacation]

At Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:44 -0500,
Theodore Tso wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML
> > > here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing
> > > the above regression.  Rafael, could you please make a note of this in
> > > your regression list,
> > 
> > Done, thanks.
> 
> Great, thanks.  I should add that technically this wasn't a regression
> since I had been seeing this since before 2.6.23.  Also, it isn't a
> big deal, since aside from noise in the syslog, falling back to
> polling more doesn't make any functional or user-visible difference
> (although I guess it's less efficient).  
> 
> Regardless of whether it is a regression, it would be nice to get the
> patch applied and and this issue fixed for 2.6.25!

You mean 2.6.24 ? ;-)

Yes, if it solves the problem, not only improves the latency, it's
definitely nice to have now.  I was just too conservative to mark it
for 2.6.24 merge although it looks safe.

Jaroslav, could you prepare this for the push?  It corresponds to
alsa-kernel HG changeset 5557.


thanks,

Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux