On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML
> > here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing
> > the above regression. Rafael, could you please make a note of this in
> > your regression list,
>
> Done, thanks.
Great, thanks. I should add that technically this wasn't a regression
since I had been seeing this since before 2.6.23. Also, it isn't a
big deal, since aside from noise in the syslog, falling back to
polling more doesn't make any functional or user-visible difference
(although I guess it's less efficient).
Regardless of whether it is a regression, it would be nice to get the
patch applied and and this issue fixed for 2.6.25!
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
