* Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:55:33PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > +#define set_pte_atomic(pteptr, pteval) set_pte(pteptr,pteval)
> > +#define set_pte_present(mm,addr,ptep,pteval) set_pte_at(mm,addr,ptep,pteval)
> >
> > +#define pte_clear(mm,addr,xp) \
> > + do { \
> > + set_pte_at(mm, addr, xp, __pte(0)); \
> > + } while (0)
> > +
> > #undef pmd_clear
> > +#define pmd_clear(xp) \
> > + do { \
> > + set_pmd(xp, __pmd(0)); \
> > + } while (0)
>
> What about turning these into inline functions to get better type
> checking?
yes, please. That will also trigger and resolve any still present
include file dependency mess. Macros are often used to hack around
unclean include file layouts.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
