Hi David,
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:34:59 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> I'm thinking there should be a non-functional change to
> the gpiolib code: move it from lib to drivers/gpio.
>
> My question is whether that's better done by replacing
> the current patches with one new patch, or by a patch
> deleting the current lib/gpiolib.c and adding a new
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c ... I think the former would
> make more sense to anyone looking at GIT history.
If gpiolib isn't in git yet, then indeed updating the patch that
creates it before it goes in git sounds more sensible. Let's not make
the git history more complex than needed.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
