On Mon, Dec 10 2007, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Monday 10 December 2007 05:19, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Precisely. So forgive me for thinking this patch hasn't seen very
> > varied testing, that's 2 errors (one simple, one bad - broken was NOT
> > a gross exageration, thanks) in very few lines.
>
> See the [RFC]? If I had meant Request For Flaming, I would have written
> that. Thankyou for the catch.
The same mail that contained this part, copied verbatim:
"Let me close with perhaps the most relevant remarks: the attached code
has been in heavy testing and in production for months now. Thus there
is nothing theoretical when I say it works, and the patch speaks for
itself in terms of obvious correctness."
We must have differing opinions on what obvious correctness is.
Future replies to /dev/null, please.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
