could you, plz, check patch sent by Eric above in this thread.
I have tried it on my test node and it works for module you have
provided. The problem exists without it.
Regards,
Den
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ultimately to implement /proc perfectly we need an implementation
>> of d_revalidate because files and directories can be removed behind
>> the back of the VFS, and d_revalidate is the only way we can let
>> the VFS know that this has happened.
>>
>> So until we get a proper test for keeping dentries in the dcache
>> fix the current d_revalidate method by completely removing it. This
>> returns us to the current status quo.
>
> Hello,
> I know that I'm late to the party, but mount points is not only
> problem with d_revalidate. With your patch in place module below gets
> refcount incremented by two every time I do 'ls -la /proc/fs/vmblock'.
>
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>
> static int vmblockinit(void) {
> struct proc_dir_entry *controlProcDirEntry;
>
> /* Create /proc/fs/vmblock */
> controlProcDirEntry = proc_mkdir("vmblock", proc_root_fs);
> if (!controlProcDirEntry) {
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "Bad...\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> controlProcDirEntry->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> return 0;
> }
>
> static void vmblockexit(void) {
> remove_proc_entry("vmblock", proc_root_fs);
> }
>
> module_init(vmblockinit);
> module_exit(vmblockexit);
>
>
> (code comes from VMware's vmblock module,
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=204462)
> Thanks,
> Petr
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
